Control of the Abuse of Power
One of the most common abuses of power is corruption, which occurs when government officials use public funds for their own benefit or they exercise power in an illegal way. To protect against these abuses, democratic governments are often structured to limit the powers of government offices and the people who work for them. For example, the executive, judicial, and legislative branches of government have distinct functions and can “check and balance” the powers of other branches. In addition, independent agencies can investigate and impartial courts can punish government leaders and employees who abuse power.
Independent Judiciary Independent Judiciary
In democracies courts and the judicial system are impartial. Judges and the judiciary branch must be free to act without influence or control from the executive and legislative branches of government. They should also not be corrupt or obligated to influential individuals, businesses, or political groups. These ideas are related to the rule of law and to controlling the abuse of power. An independent judiciary is essential to a just and fair legal system.
The Rule of Law The Rule of Law
In a democracy no one is above the law—not even a king, elected president, police officer, or member of the military. Everyone must obey the law and will be held accountable if they violate it. Democracy also insists that laws are equally, fairly, and consistently enforced.
I disagree with Forbes’ basic premise. Since I have been tracking the larger US flooding events, I am just amazed at how existing flood mapping is usually not a good indicator for flooding. Perhaps, they worked historically for riverine and hurricane related flooding but now they are finding other variables . Storm Surge, increased rainfall events likely caused or influenced by climate change, wildfire induced flooding, and the list goes on. Maybe an evolving question is how often are here maps wrong? From my reading, most flood maps are political in nature. With all the new technology available, I know the private companies are going to tap these new tools as the basis for underwriting this risk. The brave new world of technology and insurance.
The conclusion gives the overall verdict of the argument. You can also restate the ideas that you have discussed in the body paragraphs so as to make your point valid. The conclusion should also aim at motivating the reader to do research in the future. The conclusion is related to the argumentative introduction as the topic as well as the thesis statement is restated in a more convincing manner. The conclusion also gives you a platform of illustrating your decision concerning the argument in the article and why you have settled on that particular decision. Try not to introduce new ideas as they will give the readers an ideology that the article is not comprehensive enough.